“When one has reached maturity in the art, one will have a formless form. It is like ice dissolving in water. When one has no form, one can be all forms; when one has no style, he can fit in with any style.” Bruce Lee
Do you use a certain layout for planning training?
Do you have a favourite spreadsheet?
Do you always portray data in spider diagrams or pie charts because they “look cool”?
Having a structure is handy because it allows you to have consistency. It can also steer you into certain patterns that may be unsuitable for a changing situation.
I took time out this week to redesign my session planners so that they reflect the 4 cornerstones approach I now take to training athletes.
I had been training one group with an old proforma, and I felt suddenly realised that my sessions were reflecting the form, rather than my philosophy (overview below).
I now have enough flexibility to plan what I want, but have the guideline to keep me on track.
As to pie charts, this course on data visualisation has helped me become a better strength and conditioning coach due to clarity of presentation.
Any training programme for sport should consist of the following areas:
Preparation: Either planning, warming up, or getting ready to train.
Adaptation: The meat of the workout or training block. What you are trying to change physically (or sometimes mentally).
Application: In your life or sport. Change of directions, rate of force development, footwork or position specific. Putting your new food shopping and menu plan into place.
Regeneration: Mental and physical. Sleep, rest and time out from the sport. Allows you to come back ready to go again, enthused.
This can be applied to the workout, the weekly cycle, the monthly cycle and annual plans.
It’s all about balance
Each area will have different emphasis according to the time and need, but all are important and should be included to some degree.
Too much preparation work (foam roller warm ups anyone?) will not leave time/ energy for the important adaptation and application work to take place.
Too much adaptation work (must squat twice body weight?) will not leave time or energy for the application into the sport.
Too much application (sport specific) will only work in competitive situations for a short time, before burnout or injury occurs, and a decline in performance
Too much regeneration means you are detraining.
Have you reviewed your training programmes to see if you are including the 4 cornerstones in your daily, weekly, monthly and annual plans?
Vern Gambetta did a few presentations on planning training, as well as a couple on coaching itself. The overall theme was “have a plan, then work the plan”. I will cover some specifics in this blog, as well as an overall summary.
Bullet Proof The Athlete
It is important to start out with a goal. Rather than chasing some arbitrary stats, it is important to keep the athlete in shape to train, and of course to compete. This means building and rebuilding the athlete from the Ground Up.
Gambetta looks at what he calls “Foundational Legs” to get his athletes strong first. He uses fast eccentric body weight exercises (rate of 1 rep /sec) along with mini band exercises to help cause eccentric soreness which replicates demands from change of direction on the field /court. He adds load up to 30% of body weight, before moving on to other exercises.
This would include:
Single leg squat: standing, seated
Squat: regular, overhead
Lunge: regular, with reach
Step up: regular, high.
He builds up the reps from 10-12-15-18-20 or 10-15-20, depending on their development. The goal is to get 5 sets of 20. He does this 2 x week, with 2 days rest in between. The legs require more recovery than the upper body.
This is a snapshot of training planning in detail, and how a coach has come up with a plan that works.
Create a Menu of Exercises
One of the most useful insights for me was the classification of exercises, as covered by Kelvin Giles, Jack Blatherwick and again by Gambetta.
Gambetta mentioned the Doherty Strength/ Power Index (DPI) to help decide which lift is where on a scale of strength or speed.
S10 S9…….. S1
V1 V2……………V10
(See yesterday’s blog on acceleration for a similar diagram).
Then for choosing the session itself:
Classify the exercises : type of body part, movement.
Rank the Exercises: order of complexity, or difficulty.
Select the Exercises: what are you going to work on
Combine the Exercises: what complements what, super sets and so on.
In the session Gambetta uses this progression of exercises:
Remedial: waking up the body.
Ancillary: getting ready to lift.
Focus: Lifting
This was a useful way of looking at what needs to be done, providing you know what you want to achieve at the end of the session or micro cycle. Instead of “how can I fit my new exercise I learnt at the weekend into my programme?”
How to Progress your athlete
It is easy as a coach to get caught up in new “stuff”. Progressing your athlete can be done by getting them to solve movement puzzles. This helps increase efficiency.
Get a pristine movement, then create Repeatable Excellence in Movement.
Why progress something that is poor?
Why load a poor movement?
Why keep on loading a poor movement?
“Circuit training to help the movement challenge is a nonsense”.
Instead, look at increasing complexity of movements by using Puzzles that are more spcific to the sport, that involve reactions and also decision making. From working in single planes to a “neural blizzard”.
In the big scheme of things if a new idea/ process/ prescription is recommended: what are you going to sacrifice to accommodate the new unit?
Gambetta then went through different qualities that need to be developed and how. The message was that when trying to develop endurance, speed, strength or flexibility you have to:
Build the quality (efficiency of movement)
Build the Capacity (movement consistency, resilience)
Get the Improvement
Apply it
Get another Improvement
No changes are permanent or relevant unless they are applied and practiced.
Summary of the GAIN 2011
The Eagle eyed amongst you will have noticed that I said I would do 5 blogs, not 6 about GAIN. Well, there was so much information and reflection that I could write an additional 5. I haven’t mentioned:
The early morning sessions in detail, applying theory into practice, some useful information there or
The Athletic Trainer type seminars on “Return to play” “Functional Anatomy” and the Physical Competence Assessment in detail.
Greg Thompson’s excellent interactive workshop on analysing and coaching throwing mechanics.
Key lessons learnt:
How the key speakers had developed a system that works and how organised they were in delivering it. This included the importance of classifying exercises.
Using a manual as a tool for organising these thoughts into practice. But not being constrained by theory/ structures and losing adaptability.
The importance of staying sharp when coaching and being innovative in your practice (different from being gimmicky). This requires planning and reflection as well.
How important coaching is when developing the Athlete.
Things that could have been better:
The evening seminars were dire. Too many people in a big group, completely unworkable. After being on the go since 0630, this could have been an opportunity for reflection, discussion and action on our own development. Part of the reason for me signing up to GAIN was to get some critical advice on how I do things from World Class coaches. There just was not the opportunity to do this.
Splitting the seminars up: The diverse backgrounds were an advantage in offering different perspectives. They were a disadvantage when trying to please everyone at the same time with the same seminars. It would have been good to offer a choice of 2 seminars for different backgrounds.
A major part of Coach learning is done through informal interactions. This could have been recognised and time allowed/ encouraged.
The future
It may still be too soon to decide whether the hefty investment of time, money and effort (from my family too) was worth it. One of the bonuses of GAIN is the ongoing learning of an online library and discussion forum. If this works out as fruitful and avoids group think, then that will help my Coaching.
Thanks to all the Faculty and the delegates for their input and thoughts.
This was one part of the Excelsior audit I have conducted this year. The bottom line is will it help me Coach our Athletes better? Thoughts always welcome.
Further reading:
If you want to develop your coaching come along to one of our courses here
